<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Samsung LN32A450 Review</title> <atom:link href="http://www.hdtvreviewlab.com/samsung-ln32a450-review/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.hdtvreviewlab.com/samsung-ln32a450-review</link> <description>HDTV Reviews &#38; Ratings</description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2011 15:57:25 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" /> <item><title>By: Christian</title><link>http://www.hdtvreviewlab.com/samsung-ln32a450-review/comment-page-2#comment-3432</link> <dc:creator>Christian</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2011 15:34:08 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hdtvreviewlab.com/?p=1865#comment-3432</guid> <description>like everyone else it seems that has commented on this tv, i have the same problem with a tv that after only two years has suddenly started presenting a negative image. i owned an old-fashioned sony trinitron for 30 years that never gave me any trouble. planned obsolescence, i guess. samsung seems to insist that this issue doesn\&#039;t exist. a simple google of tv negative image will tell you that they\&#039;re wrong. paying $800 for a tv that lasts two years is not my idea of a good deal. buyer beware!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>like everyone else it seems that has commented on this tv, i have the same problem with a tv that after only two years has suddenly started presenting a negative image. i owned an old-fashioned sony trinitron for 30 years that never gave me any trouble. planned obsolescence, i guess. samsung seems to insist that this issue doesn\&#8217;t exist. a simple google of tv negative image will tell you that they\&#8217;re wrong. paying $800 for a tv that lasts two years is not my idea of a good deal. buyer beware!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Tom</title><link>http://www.hdtvreviewlab.com/samsung-ln32a450-review/comment-page-1#comment-2792</link> <dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 27 Oct 2010 02:37:02 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hdtvreviewlab.com/?p=1865#comment-2792</guid> <description>Another poor soul with an expensive photo negative TV set.  Got the set in the spring of 2009... now it&#039;s the fall of 2010... that magic 18 month mark mentioned so many times above... and we&#039;re in photo-negative land.  Used to snap back with a gentle tap on the top.  This last time no such luck... but after about 10 minutes it corrected itself.     Samsung used to be a favorite brand... not happy here.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another poor soul with an expensive photo negative TV set.  Got the set in the spring of 2009&#8230; now it&#8217;s the fall of 2010&#8230; that magic 18 month mark mentioned so many times above&#8230; and we&#8217;re in photo-negative land.  Used to snap back with a gentle tap on the top.  This last time no such luck&#8230; but after about 10 minutes it corrected itself.     Samsung used to be a favorite brand&#8230; not happy here.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Melanie</title><link>http://www.hdtvreviewlab.com/samsung-ln32a450-review/comment-page-1#comment-2707</link> <dc:creator>Melanie</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 28 Sep 2010 15:04:52 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hdtvreviewlab.com/?p=1865#comment-2707</guid> <description>I too am now experiencing the photo/negative issue. My model is just shy of 2 years old. I don&#039;t understand why it is an intermittent problem but based on the reading, looks like it will become permanent. We don&#039;t even watch a lot of TV and have taken good care of it.  I would think Samsung should own up to the defect or lose a lot of customers.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I too am now experiencing the photo/negative issue. My model is just shy of 2 years old. I don&#8217;t understand why it is an intermittent problem but based on the reading, looks like it will become permanent. We don&#8217;t even watch a lot of TV and have taken good care of it.  I would think Samsung should own up to the defect or lose a lot of customers.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Tim Thornton</title><link>http://www.hdtvreviewlab.com/samsung-ln32a450-review/comment-page-1#comment-2705</link> <dc:creator>Tim Thornton</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 28 Sep 2010 01:48:38 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hdtvreviewlab.com/?p=1865#comment-2705</guid> <description>Bought the TV from Amazon in 2008.  Loved it until today.  09/27/2010, the day the phillies clinched the TV developed the white background photo negative look that many complain of.  Sad that a TV only lasts two years.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bought the TV from Amazon in 2008.  Loved it until today.  09/27/2010, the day the phillies clinched the TV developed the white background photo negative look that many complain of.  Sad that a TV only lasts two years.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 2/15 queries in 0.026 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 629/633 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.hdtvreviewlab.com @ 2012-02-08 19:27:37 -->
